Information Architecture

 

Web Conventions

            Logo

á      Expected to be found in the top left-hand corner

á      Expected on every page

á      Expected to link to the homepage

           

            Navigation

á      Expected left-hand rail or directly below header

á      Expected to ÒappearÓ like navigation and not content

á      Expected to give ÒfeedbackÓ

 

Adding Emphasis with Visual Hierarchy

            Location

The upper content area, below the header is a high priority area.

 

            Contrast

Bigger and bolder type, underlining or colored type, communicate importance. But there is a balance to be struck, if type is over designed, it can communicate itÕs a promotional advertisement and to be ignored.

 

            Negative Space

Even an understated area can look like a high-priority spot if the area around it is clear of clutter.

 

 

Thinking Usability

 

Trunk Test

1) Where are you?

            What site are you at?

                        Graphics

                                    Good:              www.lacitycollege.edu

                                    Bad:                 www.canyons.edu

Logo

                        Text

            Where are you within the site?

Page Titles

            Okay:              www.lacma.org (Consistent but in bad location)

            Okay:              www.getty.edu (Inconsistent)

            Good:              www.nortonsimon.org (Consistent)

Bread Crumbs

Okay: www.amazon.com (Not consistent)

            Good: www.bhphotovideo.com

 

2) What can you do?

 

3) How can you get there?

 

 

Navigation

Rollovers

            Good & Bad: www.cnn.com (Well designed in some areas but not in others)

Tolerable:        www.annenbergspaceforphotography.org (Efficient but requires interactivity)

            Unacceptable: www.cbs.com (Very large rollover, very confusing, inconsistent)

 

Consistent Navigation

Good:              calarts.edu (Consistent throughout)

Unacceptable:  www.risd.edu (Inconsistent throughout)

 

Persistent Navigation

Okay:              www.otis.edu (Many links accessible from every page but requires interactivity)

Unacceptable:  www.schoolofvisualarts.edu (Not enough global links)

Good:              www.art.ucr.edu (Lots of links accessible on almost every page)

 

Hub and Spoke Navigation

Unacceptable:  www.lumiere-editions.com

 

Ease of Use/Efficiency

Home page designed for siteÕs main purpose

Good:              www.hertz.com

Bad:                 www.blockbuster.com

 

 ÒAll in oneÓ Design

Good:              Ihotelier online reservations system - The Broadmoor

 

Portal

Questionable:  www.ups.com

Good:              www.webex.com

 

Splash Page

Unacceptable:  www.prunerestaurant.com

 

Resolution

Scrolling Issues

Unacceptable:  www.planetquake.com (Way too large of a homepage)

Unacceptable:  www.thehorizontalway.com (Horizontal scrolling)

 

            Liquid

Questionable:  Ihotelier online reservations system - The Broadmoor (Adjusts to various screen resolutions but with no limits)

                        Good:              www.amazon.com (Adjusts to various screen resolutions)

                        Good:              www.nitrogroup.com (Adjusts to various screen resolutions)

 

            Fixed

Good:              www.rampcreative.com (Still looks acceptable at various screen resolutions)

Acceptable:      www.nytimes.com (Lots of content warrants some vertical scrolling)

 

Other Tips

Speed:                         Homepage should be fast loading

Global Links:  Should always include a ÒhomeÓ link

 

Resources

www.teachtheweb.com

www.useit.com

www.nngroup.com

www.usableweb.com

www.usability.gov

www.skip-intro.org